Feels like this is the wrong take. It's more about "if you don't want to come back to the office, we'll find someone who will!" which I think is totally fine. It's a preference for some companies, and who's to argue?
The inverse is also true. Those who go remote suddenly open up a broader net and, without even outsourcing, have the opportunity to find folks willing to work for lower salaries.
I get the thought, but feels a bit too spooky to say "WILL HAVE NO JOBS IN LESS THAN FIVE YEARS"
All about the SBI model which follows what you're outlining. Situation, behavior, impact. Easy to follow, immensely helpful for both parties. Good stuff Jake.
Good callout here of "encouraging" the interactions. Definitely not something you can force or make mandatory. Some people simply don't want to participate. My hope is that folks will want that interaction, but over time have found it's not always the case. Solid thoughts here Tobias!
